Wearing My Age
2014
A crowd sourced meditation by women about the clothing they wear to work.
funded by the Jerome Foundation
I had an idea:
The clothing we wear broadcasts information about us, whether we intend it or not. If we clothe consciously, clothing can be a form of self-publishing.
What happens when the unconscious, the inferred, subconscious or even the intended meaning of our clothing is made concrete, embroidered on uniforms that can be read and worn?
Working the idea:
I designed a uniform comprised of a jacket, a dress, a petticoat and leggings.
I chose to represent degrees of personal space and privacy by the parts of the uniform.
The Jacket was intended to be the public/corporate face of work.
The Dress was still public but a bit more personal.
The Petticoat was the secret thoughts.
The Leggings were a summation.
The language for the garments was collected from a nationally distributed survey I wrote about clothing, power and work.
Unexpected outcomes:
As I read the survey responses, one design change became necessary: The Jacket became the IN YOUR FACE rather than the corporate face of work.
I learned that the same old issues of the 1970's feminists remain. Women are still paid less, respected less, and heard less than men. Their potential for pregnancy is still regarded as an obstacle to advancement. They are looked on as sex objects. And women are still angry!
The Blog for this project can be accessed here.
2014
A crowd sourced meditation by women about the clothing they wear to work.
funded by the Jerome Foundation
I had an idea:
The clothing we wear broadcasts information about us, whether we intend it or not. If we clothe consciously, clothing can be a form of self-publishing.
What happens when the unconscious, the inferred, subconscious or even the intended meaning of our clothing is made concrete, embroidered on uniforms that can be read and worn?
Working the idea:
I designed a uniform comprised of a jacket, a dress, a petticoat and leggings.
I chose to represent degrees of personal space and privacy by the parts of the uniform.
The Jacket was intended to be the public/corporate face of work.
The Dress was still public but a bit more personal.
The Petticoat was the secret thoughts.
The Leggings were a summation.
The language for the garments was collected from a nationally distributed survey I wrote about clothing, power and work.
Unexpected outcomes:
As I read the survey responses, one design change became necessary: The Jacket became the IN YOUR FACE rather than the corporate face of work.
I learned that the same old issues of the 1970's feminists remain. Women are still paid less, respected less, and heard less than men. Their potential for pregnancy is still regarded as an obstacle to advancement. They are looked on as sex objects. And women are still angry!
The Blog for this project can be accessed here.
|
|